General Discussion

General DiscussionManta style on CK.. Why is it effective?

Manta style on CK.. Why is it effective? in General Discussion
CrusaderSk

    My last match was of CK.. I find the build much more viable... Manta style delays the power spike.. And given that ck is already mana starved. The manta style mana cost reduces the effectiveness of the hero even more..

    🍩🍪Cookie🍪🍩

      the hero works on illusions dealing a lot of damage, since illusions carry stat items and the crit ability

      you get the point, by itself it's a bad item

      but followed with some STR items like armlet, halberd, treads, drums, satanic etc.

      the item gives you MASS dps since it combos with 3 of your abilities

      TripleSteal-

        besides mentioned above, the ms bonus is very important, and additional illusions synergize with your reality rift

        Gazz   ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

          It also debuff enemy skills like slardar amplify damage or silence. Plus you can dodge some stun with it.

          Though I don't rush it. I rush Heart first before Manta but you can Yasha. The MS really helps.

          http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/2748722335

          Dog

            Stop anecdotal match samples lul

            HartzFear

              I only build manta when i build armlet as well.

              EBELEX.COM

                1)Manta gives u agi that u lack so much (even more agi than ultra-efficient skadi)
                2)Manta gives u ms so u r hussein bolt on the map
                3)Manta gives u also mana (omfg didnt u know it?)
                4)Manta lets u lock down the enemy inside ur illusions to not to let go
                5)manta lets u farm faster (becuz of additional as and u can spam illusions to clear junglecamps = just like tb but bit less effective)
                6)Ur main illusions benefit very much. Manta gives ur illusions as much efficiency as heart does

                I used to think that manta on ck is shit when i was shit player aswell. But now for me its top 1 item on ck

                Dieser Kommentar wurde geändert